It’s a war film which is not my genre of choice. I’m not a fan of realistic warlike plots or
scenes in a movie. I can understand why
Steven Spielberg may have chosen to direct this one. It’s possible he did to put out to a
mainstream audience the horrifying reality of war. I know war is an awful act of humanity and it’s
embarrassing to say the least. Why
embarrassing you may wonder? War
inhibits mankind from prospering more than we should. The time spent devising different ways to
murder one another is fruitless. The
causes for it are often even more absurd.
To end life over religion, race, land and money to name a few is
barbaric. Shouldn’t we as fellow humans
keep trying to break barriers to advance ourselves together? Hatred and untrustworthy minds would never
allow that though which will lead to me concluding my thoughts on war. I don’t have all the answers but killing a
fellow man is not one.
Captain
John Miller (Tom Hanks) is our leader of men to save Private James Ryan (Matt
Damon, not a fan) who doesn’t even want to be saved after found. The landing on the beach of Normandy is the
introduction and it’s so real it’s sickening.
The gore is a turn off for me. I
know that’s what makes it realistic though.
The Captain pushes onward and in a safety zone gets his assignment of
rescuing Ryan. His own team thinks it’s
ridiculous to do this but the Captain holds to his words that if it gets him
home to his wife than that’s all that matters.
He has a valid point at least but I still feel it’s a poor plot
idea. In a realistic attempt at war why
come up with a very unrealistic concept?
A
problem occurs again in the reality fixture of the film when Miller’s team
comes across an enemy hillside with a heavy gun atop. The team would have suffered a defeat while
charging that hill on the way to where Ryan was. The scene was set up for it too but failed to
follow through, instead opting to show an unreal way of success by the
team. The team was spread out without
suitable cover from the heavy gun; they would have been ripped apart. To only lose but the medic Wade (Giovanni
Ribisi) was not with the realism the film is trying to create. I also want to add they killed off one of the
best actors in the movie, Giovanni, sorry man.
Remembering it’s war and as they win the hill they let one German
soldier go free. Why? You killed everyone else, why is this man any
different? Is he cute? Does he remind you of your brother? He later fights against them and kills the
captain in the end. In war, such as
WWII, I don’t believe such an act would occur to let him go free while
blindfolded. His men were becoming
hostile and it was far more realistic for one of them to blow the guy to the
next life. What could the captain do
about it? Nothing, they were on their
own.
I was
disinterested at times of certain character development, one of which was the
scene toward the end as they prepared to protect that bridge. Private Ryan talking about the last night he
was with his brothers was dull and boring, he didn’t even show emotion. The casting was well overall which did help
greatly as I watched. If a weaker cast
was involved I may have closed my eyelids at times. The interpreter (Jeremy Davies) on the team
drove me crazy as the movie progressed all the way to the end. His coward behavior should have killed him on
several occasions. His “friendship” or
whatever you would like to call it with the released German soldier was another
example of unrealistic behavior. The
German soldier’s apparent sympathy for the kind and gentle interpreter was
odd. The whole team spared his life, the
German’s, at the hillside so why would he only elect to not kill the
interpreter? Wouldn’t his debt spread to
all of the men? They all had a chance to
finish him off but didn’t. You see how
it doesn’t make sense when you think on it?
I
applaud, regardless, that the film was attempted. Aside the hill scene, risking so many just to
save one man, along with the length of the film, it’s still an alright movie. I also didn’t always follow what was
happening on a battlefield. It felt like
so much going on that it became slightly confusing. Despite some criticism it still holds up well
when you look at it on the whole. I think
the movie could have benefited if it weren’t so long. The scenes tended to have a monotonous feel
to them. I couldn’t stand all that dreary
background. I know I know its war
right? That’s probably the most
realistic aspect of the entire movie.
Rating: 7 of 10
The labels just below can link you to similar posts about this one so check them out!
The labels just below can link you to similar posts about this one so check them out!
No comments:
Post a Comment